Kirkstall flood defences: Heritage watchdog’s ‘serious concerns’ over Kirkstall Abbey and Armley Mills

19 February 2019

Share this post:
  • 10
    Shares

An influential public body that protects and champions places of historical interest has raised ‘serious concerns’ over the impact of planned flood defences on both Kirkstall Abbey and Armley Mills Industrial Museum.

Historic England have raised concerns about the lack of detail in a planning application for multi-million pound flood defences along the Kirkstall Valley. The plans come more than three years after the River Aire broke its banks on Boxing Day 2015, causing widespread flooding in the area.

In a submission to Leeds City Council’s planning department, Historic England’s Neil Redfearn said:

“Whilst we are not formally objecting to the scheme as a whole, we have serious concerns about the lack of detail and justification for some of the works at Armley Mills and Kirkstall Abbey, which affect the highest graded heritage assets.

“We feel these concerns could be overcome through further dialogue prior to determination, or through suitable conditions which allow for agreement. At this stage we are unable to fully support these two elements of the scheme.”

River control measures will be installed to reduce the risk of flooding impacting on the historic Kirkstall Abbey, while part of the adjoining Kirkstall Meadows will become a wetland habitat.  At Armley Mills the defence works will include new protective walls, a new pipe bridge to improve water flow and two new control structures on the goit.

Armley Mills

These are the plans to protect historic Armley Mills from flooding.

Historic England say they are supportive of proposals to safeguard the site from future flooding, which they say should contribute to the viability of the site as a museum and visitor attraction. But they add:

“The proposed flood exclusion option would cause harm to the significance of the complex by severing the historic relationship of the complex with the water and impinging on the understanding of the water management system across the site. This harm is acknowledged in the application.

“We are more comfortable that the level of harm to the upstream end of the site would be outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme but we have greater concerns about the proposals for the downstream end.

“In particular we are concerned about the removal of the existing Milford Place bridge, the severance of the historic pedestrian route by the proposed flood walls and the appearance of the large new sluice structure within the downstream goit.”

Armley mills closed

Armley Mills closed for three months due to the post floods clean-up

Kirkstall Abbey

Historic England say the works within the abbey will require Scheduled Monument Consent and ‘significantly more’ detail will be needed before we can determine the acceptability of the proposed works. They add:

“At present the drawings we have seen are too high-level or indicative to fully assess the impact of the proposals.”

Leeds City Council have released further information to Historic England, but in a letter submitted to the council yesterday, they said the new details ‘did not have any impact on their position on the proposals’.

Consultation continues

Leeds City Council is looking to decide the application at a planning meeting in March.

A second public consultation event about the flood defence proposals will be held on Tuesday 26 February, at Milford Sports Club, Beecroft Street, between 2pm and 8pm.

Visitors will have the chance to ask questions and get more information about the proposed defences and accessibility works such as new pedestrian bridges.

Read more about The Dispatch‘s coverage of Kirkstall Valley flood defences here.

_____________

Help West Leeds Dispatch survive

Producing your daily dose of West Leeds Dispatch comes at a cost!

There’s the hosting of the website you’re reading now, running our popular e-mail newsletter, membership of independent press regulator Impress, attending summer events, paying for equipment etc etc.

We need at least £200 a month just to break even – that’s money currently coming out of the pockets of dedicated volunteers who are passionate about what’s happening in our communities, connecting you with local groups and organisations as well as holding decision-makers to account and championing local issues.

And all that’s BEFORE we even think about paying something for people’s time – for instance, our editor puts in more than 24 hours a week in his ‘spare’ time to ensure The Dispatch publishes daily.

To put it bluntly, after nearly four years of daily publishing, we are not sustainable!

And we need YOUR help to continue …

For the cost of less than a couple of cups of coffee you can help support local community news and continue to give our communities a voice by taking out a subscription for just £4 per month (that’s just a pound a week).

As a thanks you’ll get your name on a roll of honour on our website. More importantly you will be enabling us to keep bringing you the news that matters about your neighbourhood.

Achieving a bedrock of supporters will give us a firm financial footing and help us plan for the future.

Supporting us couldn’t be easier…

Just follow this link.

Over to you …




Share this post:
  • 10
    Shares

Article tags

Comment on this article

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.