What Leeds City Council is cutting from its budget in the coming year

WLD cutswatch

Words: Richard Beecham, local democracy reporter

Leeds City Council’s agreed budget for the coming year will affect hundreds of job roles in the authority, with services scaled back as the city struggles to come to terms with extra costs and loss of income caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Unlike other areas of the public sector, councils are not allowed to run at a loss, meaning they must balance budgets within the year. This, says Leeds City Council, leaves it with little flexibility to withstand the blow from Covid-19, as well as existing financial pressures on the authority.

We’ve been through the council’s financial proposals for the next municipal year, and have listed some of the cuts faced by council departments below.

Communities and Environment

This directorate is facing a net decrease of £1.4m which, although small compared to other areas of council spending, contains some major savings.

Charges for residents to replace black and brown bins will be increased by £4.60, expected to bring in an extra £110,000. Charges for bulky waste collections will increase from £20 to £30 – and are expected to generate an additional £70,000.

Bereavement fees will be increased by five per cent, which is estimated to increase council income by £367,000 a year. A reduction of grass cutting frequencies is hoped to bring in an extra £65,000.

A proposal to redevelop the golf course at Temple Newsam, approved in September 2020, is expected to bring in an extra £72,000 a year from 2022/23 onwards.

Another £625,000 is expected to be saved from the scrapping of the council’s subsidy for Police and Community Support Officers (PCSOs).

A review of the level of overhead expenditure incurred by the Council and appropriately charged to Migration Yorkshire is estimated to generate additional income of £40,000 in 2021/22.

The opening times of Otley (Ellar Ghyll) household waste site will be reduced to
weekends only, and is hoped to save £75,000 in the coming year.

Closed: West Leeds Country Park Visitor Centre in Pudsey Park. Copyright Betty Longbottom and licensed for reuse under Creative Commons Licence

The report stated West Leeds Country Park Visitor Centre in Pudsey Park has been closed to the public due to Covid-19 restrictions and savings of £90,000 per year “have been identified on the assumption that it will not re-open.”

Despite originally proposing closing half of the city’s council-run bowling greens, it was instead decided to increase the annual price of a season ticket from £31 to £40.

The authority also wants to reduce seasonal bedding displays in parks and other green spaces by half, as well as reducing floral decorations such as hanging baskets, troughs and planters in the city centre by – this is hoped to save the council £150,000 a year.

Three community centres in Leeds are also expected to shut down, saving £200,000.

Children and families

When added together, the council’s total proposed cuts to its adults and health department comes to more than £7m, with an expected reduction of 52.5 full time equivalent staff.

Organisational changes within the department – such as the transfer of some staff to the children’s and families department, make up £1.77m of the saving. Increasing prices and the reduction of the amount of cash reserves going to services make up a further £2m of cuts.

Increase in demand for services is also expected to add another £1.8m of spending pressures. 

The report states:

“Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the Directorate has worked proactively with partners across the city to provide children and young people with essential support.

“Although provision has been made in the council’s strategic budget for the ongoing financial impact of Covid, the wider implications for both short and long term need within the city mean that the Directorate will continue to work collaboratively with partners to identify priorities for service delivery moving forwards.”

Adults and Health

A total cut to the Adults and Health directorate is expected to come to £6.9m.

This is despite an increase in grant funding of £4.47m, as well as a rise in the use of council reserves. The department also wants to claw back £2m of payments for services that have not yet been paid.

But the council’s national living wage commitments are expected to bite in this area, with wage rises of more than £3m.

It is also proposed two care homes – Richmond House in Farsley and Homelea House – are shut, which is expected to save the authority £489,000.

Staff reductions overall are expected to raise about £1.2m, with a reduction of 41 staff overall.

The report stated:

“Current context for adult social care and public health is heavily influenced by the Covid pandemic. It has necessarily changed significantly how and which services are commissioned and delivered.

“The near future is therefore somewhat uncertain; in Public Health sizeable efforts will still need to be input on managing the pandemic and its after effects throughout next year and a possible reprioritisation of services funded by the PH grant.

“Adult Social Care has to work within an uncertain environment of changes to its service offer mix and whether those changes are permanent or temporary, and a care market significantly affected by the pandemic. With specificity to each service the following aims to add further context.”

City Development

The council’s City Development department aims to cut £7.55m from its budget, along with a mammoth 176 full time equivalent jobs.

Nearly £1m is expected to be raised from reductions in the council’s “core office base” and further cutting of direct property costs.

A 15 percent reduction in grants to the Leeds Grand Theatre, Opera North, Northern Ballet, Leeds Playhouse and the Henry Moore Institute is expected to save £227,000.

A further £88,000 is expected to be saved from the scrapping of the annual Christmas lights events, as well as no more support for bi-annual international football screenings in Millennium Square – meaning England’s appearances in the Euros and World Cups will no longer be screened.

Consultation is set to begin on an annual £3 charge for the young people’s Breezecard, while cutting opening hours at Lotherton Hall and Thwaite Mills Museum. Yeadon Tarn Sailing centre will also be closed under the plans, while “operating efficiencies” of £200,000 will also be sought at the John Charles Centre for Sport.


The authority’s resources department is expected to see cuts of £13.65m and a total loss of 345 members of staff.

The staff losses are expected to fall most heavily in human resources (33 full time equivalent), financial services (22.4 FTE), business support centre (22.4 FTE), business administration service (101 FTE), democratic services (7.7 FTE) and Civic Enterprise Leeds (53.5 FTE).

West Leeds Dispatch‘s Cutswatch series has been following the proposed cuts over the past few months here.

Local democracy matters. Please support local independent community led media in West Leeds…


  1. It is sad, but necessary for some of the cuts. I am not sure about all the cuts, for the Police etc, but I want to query one of the statements.

    “A proposal to redevelop the golf course at Temple Newsam, approved in September 2020, is expected to bring in an extra £72,000 a year from 2022/23 onwards”

    An extra income NEXT YEAR of £72k. I would like to know how much the redevelopment will cost THIS YEAR. If it costs more than £72k, ( which would be an extra expense this year) it seems that the EXPECTED extra £72k next year would not be an extra income, but just covering the expense of this year. So no extra income would come in until the year after ( if at all, as it is not guaranteed).

    Can someone please say how much the redevelopment will cost. I bet we could add 50%, as estimates for projects always seem to be on the lower end of the potential costs. I would rather see the money spent on things that ALL of Leeds need, not just the few that play golf.

  2. Yes, these are difficult times and councils everywhere need to be busy making cuts and savings for the sake of the tax paying general public. However, is it the usual case where by the leaders and managers keep their high flying jobs and high salaries and make the cuts further down the line.Obviously their interests must come first with the cuts made at the bottom leading to less staff, staff having to work harder for less, increases in council tax and less funding for social services. But as long as they (the council hierarchy) don’t have to suffer, we should be grateful and accept the changes, £1500;00 a tear to get my bin emptied twice a month, excellent value for money ?

  3. We will get more fly tipping with an increase in bulk items, And we will get more crime with a short fall in PSO;s. I know we have to have cuts, but I think this is the wrong choice.

  4. I think it’s wrong to increase the price of a new black bin. The black bins are constantly taken from outside people’s properties in Middleton, then taken into wooded areas and set on fire. This will just result in more fly tipping because people cannot afford to keep paying to replace them.

  5. Re the heading children & families.
    Who is the small person (52.5)who will lose
    thier job.
    Why also is ellar gyhl tip only going to be open
    On a weekend only. What will staff be paid triple time and a day off paid in lue.
    Wont this also risk more fly tipping.
    Why not get the small person to man the tip during the week and pay them half money.

  6. What about a £40k saving with the leader forgoing his fee for being the returning officer.Cutting the number of councillors from 3 to 2 in each of the wards.That would save a minimum of £300k.
    Also no pay increase for anybody over £50k,how much would that save?
    Do not employ any external consultants.Use council premises for training plus any other events where money goes out of the council.

  7. Councillors expenses are very high too. Often very much higher than an ordinary person’s salary. No mention of any reduction here

  8. Thank god they not touching our fantastic cycle path we need it and all that money we spent on it would have covered all the cuts in one go
    God bless this set of nut case’s
    I think I saw one cyclist on our great new cycle way worth ever penny
    Set of loses


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.