Thursday, December 12, 2024
HomeNewsLeeds-Bradford Airport ‘broke night flight rules’

Leeds-Bradford Airport ‘broke night flight rules’

By Don Mort, local democracy reporter

A limit on the number of night-time flights allowed at Leeds Bradford Airport was breached last year, an investigation has found.

Leeds City Council said there were 3,497 night flights during the 2023 summer season, 577 more than was permitted.

But the airport will not face further action from the council over the breach, a decision criticised by campaigners who made complaints over alleged rule-breaking.

The airport was given a requirement to operate no more than 2,920 night flights during summer seasons.

A previous investigation found the airport exceeded the permitted number of  summer night movements by 25 per cent in 2022, the council said.

Leeds-Bradford Airport’s (LBA) designated night-time period is 11pm-7am. Airport bosses said they were “disappointed” with the council’s decision and were confident in their interpretation of planning conditions.

A Leeds City Council spokesperson said: “The council has completed its investigation into the airport’s alleged non-compliance with a breach of condition notice issued in June last year.

“Having assessed all relevant matters, the council has concluded that the airport has not complied with the notice.

“The council does not consider, however, that the public interest test for bringing a prosecution in relation to the non-compliance has been met at this time.

“This cost would far outweigh the £2,500 maximum fine that could be imposed on conviction.”

The Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport (GALBA) welcomed the council’s findings.

But GALBA chairman Nick Hodgkinson said: “This is ridiculous. The council has agreed with us that LBA broke the rules 577 times last summer but they’re not going to do anything about it.

“Every extra night flight means more harm to people’s health and more pollution, damaging our climate and the air we breathe.”

The council said it had also refused two applications from the airport in Yeadon that would exclude some flights from counting towards night movements.

Certificate of Lawful Existing Use or Development (CLEUD) applications are used to determine whether certain operations are lawful under existing planning permission.

LBA chief executive Vincent Hodder said: “We’re disappointed with this decision notified by Leeds City Council today, refusing two certificates of lawfulness.

“We remain confident in our legal opinion of the planning conditions and will be considering what this means for the airport and the appropriate next steps.

“The two applications relate to a relatively small proportion of night movements and we do not anticipate that this will result in a material change to the operation of the airport.”

Two further CLEUD applications from the airport are yet to be determined, Leeds City Council said.

The council spokesperson added: “The applications were refused after being assessed against an evidential and legal test.

“This means that certain types of aircraft movement will continue to count towards the limit on the airport’s permitted number of night-time flights.

“We are continuing to assess the complex technical data submitted in relation to the other two applications, which are due to be determined by July 8.”

3 COMMENTS

  1. Claims of extra pollution are distracting and should be dropped. There is a fair assumption that the majority of untimely flights would occur at other times or land elsewhere.

    But why have a law if LCC will not enforce it? What is the maximum penalty (or surcharge) per flight? May subsequent breaches be penalised by higher fines? LBA continues to act with impunity. Prosecution could bring them closer to order. LCC would be acting on behalf of thousands of residents.

    By deciding not to prosecute what appears to be a slam dunk case, LCC seems to be working on the assumption that they would not be awarded costs. Why?

  2. Didn’t the airport do the same thing the year before too? I seem to remember that no action was taken then, but something would kick in if they did it again, which they now have done?
    It seems to me that there’s more to all this than we’re being told, maybe the council officials dealing with this have large financial interests in LBA.

  3. The airport has breached night flying rules for years and has even reported itself to LCC for 10 consecutive years but LCC have not enforced it, basically ignored it, I no the current planning (CLEUD) applications state this
    It’s really poor from the council so the airport can pretty much brake the planning application and get away with it

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

Stay Connected

3,172FansLike
518FollowersFollow
3,859FollowersFollow